Legal Opinion
Burbank v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided October 30, 1979No. Civ. A. C77-1780APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF COURT
MOYE, District Judge.
Presently before the Court in this diversity tort case is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant has, for present purposes, conceded the truth of the plaintiff’s allegations. 1
Plaintiff, a former employee of defendant Mutual, alleges that Mutual through its employees and agents “initiated a course of conduct toward the Plaintiff, the purpose of which was to generate in the Plaintiff insecurity about his job . . . [and] for the purpose of stimulating the Plaintiff to produce ever increasing volumes of work out of a fear that his job was in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Wolfe v. Sibley Lindsay & Curr Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Southern Wire & Iron, Inc. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Sawyer v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Brady v. Royal Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tuten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hall v. Synalloy Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
- Simon v. Morehouse School of MedicineDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
- Brazier v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
- Burbank v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.