Brady v. Royal Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
*314Eberhardt, Judge.
We cannot find any basis for holding that claimant suffered an “injury” resulting from “accident,” as required by the Act, and we affirm.
While the result may not have been intended or expected, the occurrence out of which her condition arose, or out of which she asserts that it arose, was in no way accidental. She was called in to the office for the discussion; the discussion proceeded between her and her superior in an apparently normal manner; and until that had ended nothing untoward happened. There is testimony which would authorize a finding (and we must accept it, since…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Charon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Montgomery v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Industrial Commission v. O'MalleyOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Payton v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pathfinder Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Hanson Buick, Inc. v. ChathamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Sawyer v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Southwire Co. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Williams v. ARA Environmental Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.