Legal Opinion

Kauchick v. Williams

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 25, 1968No. 52127PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STORCKMAN, Judge.

This is a malpractice action by a wife and her husband in two counts. In the first count the wife seeks to recover damages in the sum of $350,000; in count two the husband prays for $60,000. Among other defenses, the defendants urged that the action was barred by the two-year statute of limitations, § 516.140, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. The plaintiffs contend the running of the statute of limitations was tolled because of fraudulent concealment by the defendants. Judgment was rendered on verdicts directed in favor of the defendants and the plaintiffs have appealed. After an opinion…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Frazee v. PartneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Adams v. IsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  4. Wheeler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Albert v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Owen v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Swope v. PrintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. Koester v. American Republic Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. Smile v. LawsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API