Legal Opinion

In Re Ambulatory Pain-Pumpchondrolysis Products Liability Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided May 5, 2010No. MDL 2139PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

KATHRYN H. VRATIL, Acting Chairman.

Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiffs in one action pending in the District of Minnesota and two actions pending in the Southern District of Ohio have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the District of Minnesota. The litigation currently consists of the 102 actions listed on Schedule A. 1 Movants re quest that the Panel exclude from centralization an additional twelve actions (seven Eastern District of Kentucky actions and five Southern District of Ohio actions), on the ground that they are too…

2Cases cited1 opinion

In Re Shoulder Pain Pump-Chondrolysis Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008

3Cited by8 opinions

In re Yellow Brass Plumbing Component Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
Krumpelbeck v. Breg, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
In re Cordarone (amiodarone Hydrochloride) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016
In re Plavix Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
Powell v. I-Flow Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.