Legal Opinion
In Re Shoulder Pain Pump-Chondrolysis Products Liability Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided August 11, 2008No. MDL 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the entire Panel * : Plaintiffs in two actions pending in the District of Oregon and one action pending in the District of Minnesota have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the District of Oregon. This litigation currently consists of thirteen actions: six pending in the District of Oregon 1 and one each in the Northern District of Alabama, the District of Colorado, the Southern District of Indiana, the Eastern District of Kentucky, the District of Minnesota, the Eastern District of New York, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency Emissions Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Ambulatory Pain-Pumpchondrolysis Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In re Ambulatory Pain PumpChondrolysis Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- Powell v. I-Flow Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010