Legal Opinion

In re Plavix Products Liability Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided December 14, 2011No. MDL No. 2300PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, defendants Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc., and Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc. move for centralization of the twelve actions1 listed on Schedule A in the District of New Jersey. All responding plaintiffs oppose centralization.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we conclude that Section 1407 centralization would not serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses or further the just and efficient conduct of this litigation.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Ambulatory Pain-Pumpchondrolysis Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Plavix Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API