Clarkson and Co. v. Harding County
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In appraising agricultural real estate, are long-term conditions impairing livestock growth and reproduction, such as oil well facilities on grazing land, a valid factor in valuation? Because statutes controlling the assessment of agricultural land require consideration of the capacity of the land to produce agricultural products, including livestock, this factor justified a lower valuation than the one given by the taxing authorities. The circuit court’s order upholding a reduced assessment is affirmed.
Facts
[¶2.] Clarkson & Co. and William and Shirley Clarkson…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Butte County v. VallerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Beals v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Pirmantgen v. Roberts County, South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Apland v. Butte CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Bison Township v. Perkins CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.