Legal Opinion

Clarkson and Co. v. Harding County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In appraising agricultural real estate, are long-term conditions impairing livestock growth and reproduction, such as oil well facilities on grazing land, a valid factor in valuation? Because statutes controlling the assessment of agricultural land require consideration of the capacity of the land to produce agricultural products, including livestock, this factor justified a lower valuation than the one given by the taxing authorities. The circuit court’s order upholding a reduced assessment is affirmed.

Facts

[¶2.] Clarkson & Co. and William and Shirley Clarkson…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butte County v. VallerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Beals v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Pirmantgen v. Roberts County, South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Apland v. Butte CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Bison Township v. Perkins CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API