Legal Opinion

Butte County v. Vallery

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1999No. 20896PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Landowner brought an action against county board of equalization challenging board’s assessment of his property, which was based on a method that classified certain real property as irrigable, as compared to dryland, and valued it as such. The circuit court reversed the assessment finding that irrigated or irrigable land cannot be separately classified for purposes of taxation under the South Dakota Constitution. The circuit court ordered the county assess in a similar manner to that of all other agricultural lands. The county appeals. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. West Two Rivers Ranch v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Spitzack v. Berg Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hutchinson County v. FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Burke v. Butte CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Arends v. Dacotah CementSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Pirmantgen v. Roberts County, South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Smith v. TRIPP COUNTYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Apland v. Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API