Legal Opinion

Beals v. Wagner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Richard and Melva Beals appeal the trial court’s ruling that the hearing examiner’s decision did not overturn the county’s valuation of Beals’ property and thus, Beals are not entitled to a refund of 1999 taxes, which were paid according to the County’s initial valuation. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Richard and Melva Beals own real estate in Day County. This real estate was previously classified as non-agri-eultural land for real estate tax purposes but was vacated and reclassified as agricultural land in June of 1998. However, these changes were not properly recorded…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between Groseth International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Moe v. MoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Raschke v. DeGraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Richter Enterprises, Inc. v. Sully CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Administration of the Florence Y. Wallbaum Revocable Living Trust AgreementSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Luke v. StevensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Stehly v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Smith v. TRIPP COUNTYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Beals v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API