Beals v. Wagner
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Richard and Melva Beals appeal the trial court’s ruling that the hearing examiner’s decision did not overturn the county’s valuation of Beals’ property and thus, Beals are not entitled to a refund of 1999 taxes, which were paid according to the County’s initial valuation. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Richard and Melva Beals own real estate in Day County. This real estate was previously classified as non-agri-eultural land for real estate tax purposes but was vacated and reclassified as agricultural land in June of 1998. However, these changes were not properly recorded…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between Groseth International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Moe v. MoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Raschke v. DeGraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Richter Enterprises, Inc. v. Sully CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Administration of the Florence Y. Wallbaum Revocable Living Trust AgreementSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Luke v. StevensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Stehly v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Smith v. TRIPP COUNTYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Beals v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.