Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson Chemical Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 1992PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bracken, J. P.

May a plaintiff who admittedly failed to read the warnings supplied by the manufacturer of a product recover damages based on the theory that the manufacturer’s warnings were inadequate? We hold that, under certain circumstances, a plaintiff may so recover.

On August 14, 1985, the plaintiff Julie Kono went to Bobby’s Department Store II on Church Avenue in Brooklyn, and purchased approximately six or seven cans of a product which she described alternatively as "La Bomba” or "King Roach Spray”. She intended to combat a roach infestation in her apartment in…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Garrett v. Holiday Inns, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Kriz v. SchumNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Porrazzo v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Anderson v. Hedstrom Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  3. Banks v. Makita, U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Lara v. Delta International Machinery Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  5. Santoro Ex Rel. Santoro v. DonnellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API