Legal Opinion
Greeno v. Clark Equipment Company
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided January 15, 1965No. Civ. 1377PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, District Judge.
This products liability action was commenced by the filing of an original complaint in three counts, federal jurisdiction being based on diverse citizenship. Plaintiff’s original three counts were grounded in breach of implied warranty, negligence, and breach of express warranty, respectively. Thereafter, with leave of Court, plaintiff amended his original complaint by the addition of Counts Four and Five. Bared of the usual formalities, plaintiff’s additional counts are grounded upon theories of strict liability and wilful and wanton misconduct, respectively.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Cintrone v. Hertz Truck Leasing & Rental ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.