Legal Opinion

Baum v. Yeutter

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 28, 1991No. C88-234APublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

On June 29, 1990, 750 F.Supp. 845, the Court issued its Memorandum Opinion and Judgment Entry granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their claim that for purposes of determining food stamp allocations, the Secretary of Agriculture and the state and county defendants have improperly treated the utilities reimbursement check that plaintiffs receive as tenants in federally assisted public housing projects as income in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 2014(d)(1).

Three issues remain for the Court’s resolution. Initially, the Court must…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Willie S. Craft v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  3. Colbeth v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1982
  4. Patricia Cotton v. Agnes M. MansourCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Baum v. YeutterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. South Dakota, Department of Social Services v. MadiganDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1993
  2. Baum v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Baum v. MadiganDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API