Legal Opinion

Baum v. Yeutter

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 29, 1990No. C88-234APublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court are the parties' cross motions for summary judgment as to all counts of the plaintiffs’ complaint. To summarize, plaintiffs seek review of the Secretary of Agriculture’s practice whereby the Secretary counts as income for the purposes of determining food stamp benefits 1 reimbursement payments the plaintiffs receive for home utilities expenses pursuant to the Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1401, et seq., as administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD”). 2

Plaintiffs, as public housing tenants, pay “rent”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. West v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baum v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Larry v. YamauchiDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1990
  3. West v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Bliek v. PalmerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  5. Baum v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API