Legal Opinion

Baum v. Espy

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1995No. 94-3081Published

1Opinion of the Court

48 F.3d 1219

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Robin BAUM, individually and on behalf of all others

similarly situated; Emma Detillion; and Sheila

Lawson, individually and on behalf of

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Mike ESPY, Secretary of Department of Agriculture; Arnold

R. Tompkins, Director, Ohio Department of Human Resources;

and John J. Witkosky,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Deakins v. MonaghanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Mary Lou Westmoreland v. National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. WJW-TV, Inc. v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API