Legal Opinion

Baum v. Madigan

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 31, 1991No. C88-0234APublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

The plaintiffs in this case claim that the defendants, the Secretary of Agriculture as well as state and local officials, improperly treated the utility reimbursement checks the plaintiffs receive as tenants in federally assisted public housing as income which led to a reduction in the plaintiffs’ award of food stamps. In a Memorandum Opinion issued June 29, 1990 and published at 750 F.Supp. 845 (N.D.Ohio 1990) (“Baum I”), the Court agreed. Thereafter, the Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, denied plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colbeth v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1982
  2. Patricia Cotton v. Agnes M. MansourCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Baum v. YeutterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
  4. Baum v. YeutterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API