Legal Opinion

Angell v. Angell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1948No. Civ. 13533PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals from a minute order of the trial court denying her written noticed motion for a final decree of divorce, which motion was made after the expiration of more than one year from the date of the entry of the interlocutory. The facts are uncontradicted and are as follows:

On July 23, 1945, plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce against defendant on the ground of extreme cruelty. The action was contested by defendant. On January 8,1946, after a trial, the court determined that plaintiff was entitled to a divorce and directed her counsel to prepare findings. Such findings were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lane v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Helbush v. HelbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Peters v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Cargnani v. CargnaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Chester v. ChesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of ModnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hicks v. ClaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Nacht v. NachtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Kern v. KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Nemer v. NemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API