Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. LaMonte

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 2004PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 After a conversation with a police officer, Appellant, Matthew LaMonte, Jr., consented to a search of his person which revealed that he was carrying a pipe containing cocaine residue. On appeal, Appellant asks us to determine whether the fruits of that search should have been suppressed. Appellant contends that the initial detention was illegal and that it tainted the subsequent search, rendering it involuntary. We hold that the initial detention was a proper investigative detention and that Appellant’s consent to the subsequent search was voluntary. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. AcostaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. CauleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. AtkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API