Commonwealth v. LaMonte
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
McCAFFERY, J.:
¶ 1 After a conversation with a police officer, Appellant, Matthew LaMonte, Jr., consented to a search of his person which revealed that he was carrying a pipe containing cocaine residue. On appeal, Appellant asks us to determine whether the fruits of that search should have been suppressed. Appellant contends that the initial detention was illegal and that it tainted the subsequent search, rendering it involuntary. We hold that the initial detention was a proper investigative detention and that Appellant’s consent to the subsequent search was voluntary. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. AcostaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. CauleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. AtkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.