Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 2005PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 Eric Dion Bell (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following a stipulated, non-jury trial in which the trial court found him guilty of possession of a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, and possession of drug paraphernalia.1 The trial court imposed an aggregate term of confinement of not less than thirty-six months or more than seventy-two months, followed by a term of twelve months’ probation. Both Appellant and the trial court have complied with the requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 1925. We affirm.

¶ 2 We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. RogersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. PerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. Valdivia, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Com. v. Carmenates, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Commonwealth v. ValdiviaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API