Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Gorman
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided June 9, 2010No. CIV 09-1184 JB/ACTPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order, filed April 13, 2010 (Doc. 20). The Court held a hearing on May 12, 2010. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should issue a protective order stating that Plaintiff Ralph Murphy’s retained legal counsel, the law firm of Keleher & McLeod, P.A. (“the Keleher law firm”) in Albuquerque, New Mexico, is not required to produce documents which Defendant Dena C. Keeling Gorman has requested in a Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information or Objects…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Benavidez v. Sandia National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Bustillos v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- S2 Automation LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Tom v. S.B., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.