Wames v. Director
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, C. J.
The applicant has been adjudged to be a defective delinquent on three separate occasions.
In his present application for leave to appeal, he makes the following contentions: (1) Insufficiency of the evidence; (2) finding of the trial court was against the weight of the evidence; (3) evidence indicated he was able to re-enter society or in the alternative be sent for treatment to a mental hospital; and *40(4) “applicant submits that the Act [Code (1957), Article 31B], as applied is unconstitutional.”(1) and (2)
The answer to (2) also answers (1). Dr. Boslow, the Director of Patuxent, who is an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dickerson v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Oppel v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Sansbury v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Raven v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
3Cited by1 opinion
- Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966