Legal Opinion

Wames v. Director

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 6, 1965No. App. No. 4PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, C. J.

The applicant has been adjudged to be a defective delinquent on three separate occasions.

In his present application for leave to appeal, he makes the following contentions: (1) Insufficiency of the evidence; (2) finding of the trial court was against the weight of the evidence; (3) evidence indicated he was able to re-enter society or in the alternative be sent for treatment to a mental hospital; and *40(4) “applicant submits that the Act [Code (1957), Article 31B], as applied is unconstitutional.”(1) and (2)

The answer to (2) also answers (1). Dr. Boslow, the Director of Patuxent, who is an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Oppel v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Sansbury v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Raven v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API