Legal Opinion

Searle v. Searle

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1974No. 13335PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice:

Defendant, husband, appeals from a decree of divorce, wherein plaintiff, wife, was awarded certain real and personal property in lieu of alimony. Defendant urges this court to review the evidence and make its own determination relative to the distribution of the property of the parties. In essence, defendant contends that it was inequitable and unjust to award plaintiff approximately one half of the property accumulated during their 27 years of marriage and claims that an award of permanent alimony would be more appropriate under the particular circumstances.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. MacDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wilson v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Humphreys v. HumphreysUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Harding v. HardingUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Slaughter v. SlaughterUtah Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Noble v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bustamante v. BustamanteUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gramme v. GrammeUtah Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API