Legal Opinion

Harding v. Harding

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1971No. 12297PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff, Max E. Harding, appeals from-, an order that reduced his alimony payments from $250 to $200 per month. He-contends that the reduction was too small;, and that due to change in circumstances since the divorce it was inequitable and unjust for the court to refuse to reduce the-alimony to $100 per month in accordance with his petition.

The parties married in 1942; have reared, four children, two married, and a son Philip (now 24), and a daughter Vicki (now age 20) at home. After 27 years of marriage, in 1969 plaintiff Max commenced the divorce proceeding. His wife…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. MacDonald v. MacDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Pinion v. PinionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hendricks v. HendricksUtah Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Willey v. WilleyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Read v. ReadUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Humphreys v. HumphreysUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Searle v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API