Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. MacDonald

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1951No. 7665PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this action for a divorce; defendant counterclaimed for separate maintenance; her counsel asked at the trial to amend to ask for a divorce also. Judgment was for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The numerous points she relies on for reversal fall generally under these two main contentions: (1) that the evidence does not support the judgment granting the plaintiff a divorce, but to the contrary requires judgment for her on her counterclaim; and (2) that the decree was inequitable and unjust to her. Certain other assignments of error, deemed to be of sufficient…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Pinion v. PinionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Burt v. BurtWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Alldredge v. AlldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Dahlberg v. DahlbergUtah Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Schantz v. SchantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Wilson v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Steiger v. SteigerUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Mueller v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API