MacDonald v. MacDonald
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this action for a divorce; defendant counterclaimed for separate maintenance; her counsel asked at the trial to amend to ask for a divorce also. Judgment was for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
The numerous points she relies on for reversal fall generally under these two main contentions: (1) that the evidence does not support the judgment granting the plaintiff a divorce, but to the contrary requires judgment for her on her counterclaim; and (2) that the decree was inequitable and unjust to her. Certain other assignments of error, deemed to be of sufficient…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Pinion v. PinionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Burt v. BurtWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Alldredge v. AlldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Dahlberg v. DahlbergUtah Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Schantz v. SchantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Wilson v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Steiger v. SteigerUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Mueller v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.