Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Campbell

Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Decided March 28, 1963No. 599032PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Chief Referee.

This case raises a question about the disposition of unexpended income held by the trustee of a testamentary trust created for the benefit of the testator’s daughter. The case also presents questions relating to Section 2107.06, Revised Code, commonly referred to as the Mort-main Statute.

The basic facts, as stipulated or admitted by the pleadings, are as follows.

In 1948 the testator, Charles E. Roseman, Jr., married Ann Braasch (now Mrs. Ann B. Lloyd). One child, Maria Celeste Roseman, was born of this marriage on December 2, 1951. On March 19, 1952, Charles E. Roseman,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Orr v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Katz Investment Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. Straus's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. New York Trust Co. v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ShumanCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API