Rowe v. Braden
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The question, for decision in this case, broadly stated, is whether the state of Ohio has the power and authority under the so-called “Intangible Tax Law,” Section 5323 and related sections of the General Code (114 Ohio Laws, 714), to tax the equitable, beneficial interest of a resident beneficiary under a trust the corpus of which is located outside this state and the trust held by a nonresident trustee.
In a consideration of the questions involved it is essential to give a brief summary of the sections relevant to the issue. The portions of the statutes applicable are as follows:
Section…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Kirtland v. HotchkissSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Martin v. SutcliffeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- McCulloch v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re ArmisteadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Mayor of Baltimore v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Heuck, Aud. v. Haefner, Exrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.