People v. Banning Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, J. W. McKinley, Frank Karr, Ward Chapman, Sheldon Borden, Edward E. Bacon, and W. R. Millar, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The action was begun to obtain a decree adjudging that plaintiff is the owner of the land embraced in two tide land locations, numbered respectively 152 and 153, for which patents have been issued by the state officers and declaring that the claims of the defendant under said patents are invalid. Judgment below was given for the plaintiff.
All of the land is situated within two miles of the corporate limits of the town of Wilmington as incorporated by the act of 1872. (Stats. 1871-72, p. 108.) This act was repealed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- McCusker v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- United States v. WhiteUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
- People ex rel. Wallen v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newcomb v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Koyer v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Coen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- City of Los Angeles v. Borax ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- People Ex Rel. Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.