Koyer v. Miner
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The transcript in this case embraces the record of two actions involving the same questions relating to the rights pertaining to two adjoining parcels of upland fronting upon the bay of San Pedro. One parcel belongs wholly to the plaintiff. In the other he has a one-half undivided interest. The southerly boundary of the two parcels is the line of ordinary high tide. The parcels are a part of a grant of land made by the government of Mexico prior to the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and afterward confirmed by the United States, and known as Rancho Los Palos Verdes. From said high-tide line into…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Patton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Henry Dalton & Sons Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Knudson v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- City of Newport Beach v. FagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. HeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- State Land Board v. SAUSEOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Carpenter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.