Legal Opinion

Wasatch Irrigation Co. v. Fulton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Wasatch County. — Hon. W. N. Dusenb&rry, Judge. Action by the Wasatch Irrigation Company and others against Edward Eulton and others. Erom a judgment determining tbe water, rights of the various parties, some of defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

This suit was brought by the plaintiffs, including several corporations and a large number of individuals, against the defendants, also including several corporations and numerous individuals, to restrain the defendants from interfering with the rights.of the plaintiffs to the water of the Provo river appropriated by them, and to determine the rights of all the parties to this action to the use of water from that stream. At the trial, the court, having made its findings of fact, entered a decree by which the water rights of the various parties, plaintiffs and defendants, were determined, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coveny v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Coglan v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Watson v. San Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Kelly v. MackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Benson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Egelund v. FayterUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Armstrong v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hall v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Baglin v. Earl-Eagle Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API