Legal Opinion

Benson v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from the district court of the fourth district. Hon. James A. Miner, judge. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

In this case a motion is made to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that no undertaking on appeal has been given. An inspection of the transcript on file shows that no undertaking has been filed, but an affidavit has been filed in the office of the clerk of the district court which was no doubt intended to take the place of an undertaking. The material part of the affidavit is as follows: “ I do solemnly swear that I am not able to bear the expenses of this action on appeal, which I am about to take to the supreme court of the Territory of TJtah, and that I am justly entitled to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tyler v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Blum v. Brownstone Bros.California Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoagland v. HoaglandUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Wasatch Irrigation Co. v. FultonUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In re Jones' EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API