State v. Ford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*3BUTTLER, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, assigning error to the trial court’s failure to suppress evidence obtained in the course of a search allegedly conducted in violation of the “knock and announce” rule, ORS 133.235, and the Fourth Amendment. We agree that the search constituted a statutory violation that requires suppression and reverse.
Eugene Police Officer Nauta stopped defendant and a woman while they were in a car in which defendant was a passenger. Nauta asked defendant and the woman for their names and addresses.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. BrockOregon Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. StalbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. SwaffordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.