Legal Opinion

In Re Conservancy District No. 37

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 24, 1964No. 40505PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

398 P.2d 525 (1965)

In re Appeal on CONSERVANCY DISTRICT NO. 37 IN LINCOLN AND OKLAHOMA COUNTIES, Oklahoma.

Willie KUHR and all other Protestants, Plaintiffs in Error,

v.

H. W. GOGGIN and all other Petitioners, Defendants in Error.

No. 40505.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

November 24, 1964.

Rehearing Denied January 26, 1965.

P. D. Erwin, Chandler, for plaintiffs in error.

Robert W. Blackstock, Bristow, for Kickapoo Nation Water and Soil Conservancy Dist. No. 37, defendants in error.

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court of Lincoln County establishing the "Kickapoo Nation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. RazzookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 2Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Stephens CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. In Re Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Tandy v. GarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bridal v. Cottonwood Creek Conservancy District No. IISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. In Re Conservancy District No. 5, Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API