Legal Opinion

In Re Initiative Petition No. 2

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1935No. 22577PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from the finding of the city clerk of the city of Chandler, holding insufficient an initiative petition which sought an election on the question of the repeal of the city charter of said city and return to the statutory form of city government. See section 4504, C. O. S. 1921, also section 6647, C. O. H. 1921.

The latter section of the statute makes applicable so far as practical the provisions of chapter 50, C. O. S. 1321 (ch. 30, O. S. 1931), relating to state initiative and referendum procedure, to the cities and towns in “all matters concerning the operation of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 23, State Question No. 38Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Littell v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Uhl v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State ex rel. Noyes v. LaneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Beecham v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Utah Safe to Learn-Safe to Worship Coalition, Inc. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Halgren v. Welling, SEC. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In Re Initiative Petition No. 364Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Browning v. Florida Hometown Democracy, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Payne v. School Dist. No. 97Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API