State v. Farris
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Twelfth Judicial District Court, Parish of De Soto; John H. Boone, Judge. Luscius Earris was convicted of murder, and on appeal the case was remanded for the purpose of taking testimony.
1Opinion of the CourtDawicins, J.
This case was remanded for tlie purpose of taking testimony in order to enable this court to determine whether or not objection and exception had been made to certain remarks of the district attorney in his closing argument to the jury. This has been done, and the matter is now before us for consideration.
The minute clerk, whose duty it was to keep a record of proceedings, swears most positively that the objection contended for by defendant was made, and that he, at the request of counsel, furnished the latter with two blank subpoenas, on which the notation thereof was-made with the judge’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DupreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- State v. MistichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- State v. SabaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943