State v. Saba
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentO’Niell, Chief Justice
My opinion is that this case should be remanded to the district court for a further hearing of the motion for a new trial, in order to determine whether the judge’s suspicion that the alleged newly discovered witnesses, J. L. Strahan and J. P. Mitchell, committed perjury, and that Abraham Saba committed the crime of subornation of perjury, for the purpose of thwarting the administering of justice, is well founded. To me that accusation is more important than the accusation that Collie Saba committed the crime of kidnapping.
When a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- People v. LeontiNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- State v. HylandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- People v. ArataNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.