Legal Opinion

State v. Mistich

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 4, 1937No. 34158PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

Relator, who was convicted of the offense of cattle stealing, filed an application for a writ of certiorari to review the • actions of the district attorney and the trial judge in failing and refusing to act upon twenty-five bills of exception submitted to them for their approval, and for a writ of mandamus to compel the district attorney to approve and the trial judge.to sign the -twenty-five bills of exception, or to state their reasons for refusing to do so. We issued a rule nisi, and the respondents pleaded that the accused was not entitled to the relief sought for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BourgeoisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. State v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. State v. LabordeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  5. State v. FarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. AugustineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  3. State v. DouglasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  4. State v. HooverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  5. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API