Legal Opinion
Cordonier v. Central Shopping Plaza Associates
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 1978No. Civ. 52340PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON, J.
The Happy Steak, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as franchisor) and Larry D. and Mary S. Cordonier, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to collectively as Cordonier) appeal from a judgment of dismissal as to defendant Central Shopping Plaza Associates (hereinafter referred to as Plaza) entered by the trial court after the general demurrer of Plaza to plaintiffs’ complaint for damages for breach of a lease was sustained without leave to amend.
Facts
The complaint which seeks damages for breach of lease alleges, in substance, the following facts: That franchisor is a California…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- A.C. Shaw Construction, Inc. v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Fundin v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Johnson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.