Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Brown
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1992No. S-4351PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
INTRODUCTION
This case concerns the interpretation of a University Heights Subdivision covenant requiring a downhill landowner to cut trees to preserve the view for the benefit of uphill neighbors.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The University Heights Subdivision was developed by the B.B.P. Corporation, and Joe Vogler and Doris Vogler, the corporation’s sole shareholders. In approximately 1972, the original plat for the subdivision was set out. The subdivision is currently composed of eight additions which have a total of 60 or 70 lots of two to three acres in size. At…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lenhoff v. Birch Bay Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Walsh v. EmerickAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- B.B.P. Corp. v. CarrollAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Lamoreux v. LanglotzAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Greenbrier-Cloverdale Homeowners Ass'n v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kalenka v. TaylorAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Dominic Wenzell, D.M.D. P.C. v. IngrimAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Hurst v. Victoria Park Subdivision Addition No. 1 Homeowners' Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Gordon v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1992