People v. Nop
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
Defendant was charged hy information under section 636 of the Penal Code with a violation of the fish laws. The superior court decided it had not jurisdiction to try the offense charged, and the people have appealed from that decision.
Th’e punishment provided hy the Penal Code for all parties convicted of a violation of the provisions of said section 636 determines the jurisdictional question here involved. If the.punishment to he inflicted for a violation of the provisions of this section-may not exceed five hundred dollars’ fine, or six months’ imprisonment in the county jail, then the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex parte AnearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Palermo Land and Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- Turner v. Fidelity Loan ConcernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- People v. HaagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Rasmussen v. Zundel, Sheriff, Etc.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
- In re MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.