Ex parte Anear
California Supreme Court
Application in the Supreme Court for a discharge ■ from custody on a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The prisoner aslcs to be discharged from custody upon habeas corpus. He was prosecuted and *371convicted before a justice of the peace of Montezuma township, Solano county, for violating certain provisions of the fish and game law of this state, found in section 636 of the Penal Code as amended. (Stats. 1895, p. 262.) The statute declares a violation of any of the various provisions of that section to be a misdemeanor, and further declares that any person found guilty of a violation of any of its provisions shall be fined in a sum not less than one hundred dollars, or be imprisoned in a county…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Rasmussen v. Zundel, Sheriff, Etc.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. NopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- McGranahan v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922