Reed v. Siddall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants, Aaron Carlson, Nelson-Tuthlll Lumber Company, Frank T. Thompson and Warner Hardware Company, from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county entered pursuant to the findings and order of Harrison, J.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J
In April, 1902, plaintiff made application, under the provisions of chapter 237, p. 348, Laws 1901, known as the “Torrens Act,” for the registration of title to certain lots, which she claimed to own, in the city of Minneapolis. Proceedings were thereafter had as required by the various provisions of the statute, and resulted in a decree on July 26, 1902, registering title in plaintiff as prayed for in her application. Subsequently defendants applied, under section 28 of the act, for leave to interpose answers therein, and from an order granting the same an appeal was taken to this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Newell v. DartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Reed v. SiddallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Seeger v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Doyle v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Hendricks v. HessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Purchase v. Village of DesplainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.