Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Mott

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1899No. S. F. No. 501PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. A. L. Frick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

Appeal from final judgment and order granting plaintiff’s petition for a writ of mandate to compel appellants in their capacity as the city council of Oakland to set apart from the funds of that city money, not exceeding twelve thousand dollars, sufficient to pay all warrants issued by the board of trustees of the exempt fireman’s relief fund and audited by the auditor of said city. ,

The action is based upon an act of the legislature entitled, *498“An act to create an exempt firemen’s relief fund in the several counties, cities and counties, cities and towns of the state, and relating to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Bourn v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Patty v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Cobbs v. Home Ins. Co. of New YorkAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Veterans' Welfare Board v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API