Legal Opinion

People v. Gott

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1994No. C012093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

— A jury convicted defendant of several controlled substance offenses, including one count of receiving, without a permit, a substance from outside of California containing ephedrine which is barred from transfer under federal law. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11106.) She appeals from the ensuing order of probation.

Defendant concedes that she did not have a permit. She claims the evidence fails to show that federal law bars transfer of the ephedrine she received. The Attorney General accepts defendant’s assessment but claims she bears the burden of producing such evidence.

In the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. AbbeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  4. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  5. Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Brentwood v. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. People v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. People v. LAMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API