People v. Henley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THAXTER, J.
A felony is “serious” if the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person other than an accomplice. When the prior conviction of such a felony is alleged for purposes of the three strikes law, must the prosecution prove that the injured party was not an accomplice? We will answer this question in the affirmative. Because the trial court placed the burden of proof on the defendant, and because substantial evidence does not support the court’s finding that the prior felony was serious, we will reverse.
Factual and Procedural Background
The underlying facts are…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. DelgadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. VerlindeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- The People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. BohanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.