Legal Opinion
Boyle v. Judy Cab Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
In an action brought by the plaintiff to recover for personal injuries sustained as a result of the *747claimed negligence of the defendant, plaintiff moves for an examination before trial of all of the defendants on 21 separate and distinct items. Upon the argument of the motion, items numbered 15, 18 and 21 were consented to and those items of examination are accordingly granted. Defendant objects to an examination with respect to the remaining 18 items set forth in the notice of motion and since all of those items are with respect to a common question, they will be discussed as one.
On…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- P. S. & A. Realties, Inc. v. Lodge Gate Forest, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Path Instruments International Corp. v. Asahi Optical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Walkovszky v. CarltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Langabeer v. HultsNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Boyle v. Judy Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961