Lick v. Madden
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The Court below sustained the demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff declined to amend, judgment was rendered for defendant, and plaintiff appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
This is an appeal from,a judgment rendered by the District Court on a demurrer to the complaint.
The complaint shows that the defendant Madden was County Clerk of Sacramento County, and acting as such on the 10th day of January, 1861; that on that day the plaintiff commenced suit in the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District in and for the City and County of Sacramento, of which Madden was Clerk, against C. Ihmels, Gr. Reinecke and C. Stockfleth, to recover the sum of one thousand six hundred and twenty-eight dollars. The complaint as amended then continues: “…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Hamilton v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Young v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
- Edmondson v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spanagel v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. McGladeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bush & Mallett Co. v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- United States v. GriswoldUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
- Jones v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.