Edmondson v. Mason
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The answer was a general denial. Plaintiff had judgment; defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
Cope, J. and Baldwin, J. concurring.
This is an action for money alleged to have been received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff, and arises upon the following facts. In May, 1860, one Castro instituted a suit in the District Court for the county of Alameda, against one Huce and seventy-nine others, and obtained from the Clerk, for service, certified copies of the summons, complaint and injunction in the case. These copies, with the certificates ready to be signed, were printed, and were handed by the attprney of Castro to the defendant, who is the Clerk of the Court, with a…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Golden Gate Consolidated Hydraulic Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- United States v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1887
- Lick v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864