People v. McGlade
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The defendant was convicted of forgery, and appeals from the judgment, from an order denying, his motion for a new trial, and from an order denying his motion in arrest of judgment.
Appellant contends for a reversal on several grounds, but, in our opinion, no one of them is tenable. The main point relied on is the insufficiency of the indictment. Appellant is charged with forging and uttering “a certain instrument in writing, to wit, a certain demand on the treasury of the city and county of San Francisco aforesaid; and said instrument in writing, to wit, said demand on the treasury of said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. MunroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. BibbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ex parte FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Lick v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. BercovitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. TomaltyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- People v. GayleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. McDermottIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.