Legal Opinion

People v. McGlade

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1903No. Crim. No. 916PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

The defendant was convicted of forgery, and appeals from the judgment, from an order denying, his motion for a new trial, and from an order denying his motion in arrest of judgment.

Appellant contends for a reversal on several grounds, but, in our opinion, no one of them is tenable. The main point relied on is the insufficiency of the indictment. Appellant is charged with forging and uttering “a certain instrument in writing, to wit, a certain demand on the treasury of the city and county of San Francisco aforesaid; and said instrument in writing, to wit, said demand on the treasury of said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MunroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. BibbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Ex parte FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Lick v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. BercovitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. TomaltyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. People v. GayleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State v. McDermottIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API