Legal Opinion

Xerox Corp. v. City of Pittsburgh

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1974No. Appeal, 1037 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

This appeal primarily raises the question as to whether or not the appellant, Xerox Corporation (Xerox), must pay the City of Pittsburgh’s “Business Privilege Tax” for the years 1971 and 1972 on receipts gained from the leasing of equipment to Pittsburgh customers. Xerox also failed to pay the tax on such revenues for 1969 and 1970, but the imposition of the tax for those years is not being challenged in this appeal.

In December of 1968, the City of Pittsburgh (City) enacted Ordinance No. 675 imposing a tax upon the privilege of operating or conducting business in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown & Zortman Machinery Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Tax Review Board v. Esso Standard DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Tyger & Karl Complete Water System Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. George A. Fuller Co. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Manoa Shopping Center, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. CzepurnyjCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Wilbert v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Serefeas v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Geisinger Health System and Geisinger Clinic v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Fee Review Hearing Office (SWIF)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Union Electric Corp. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review of Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API