Legal Opinion

George A. Fuller Co. v. City of Pittsburgh

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1974No. Appeal, No. 731 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

In December of 1968, the City of Pittsburgh (City) enacted Ordinance No. 675 imposing a tax upon the privilege of operating or conducting business in the City. The ordinance, which became effective on February 1, 1969, required the tax to be paid annually and *405its amount to be determined by the volume of the taxpayer’s gross annual receipts. It authorized the City Treasurer to promulgate rules and regulations in connection with administration and enforcement of the tax, and, purportedly pursuant to this authority, the City Treasurer issued such regulations in 1969.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foley Bros., Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Volunteer Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. MinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. DiMeglioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Moon Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. In re Spectrum Arena, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Pittsburgh v. Royston Service, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Xerox Corp. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Conyer v. Borough of NorristownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. May Department Stores Co. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Gilligan v. Pennsylvania Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API