Legal Opinion

Wilbert v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1978No. 140PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

On July 29, 1972, Judith T. Wilbert, operating an automobile registered in her name, was involved in an accident with an automobile driven by an uninsured motorist. Three Wilbert children were with their mother; mother and children were all injured.

On the date of the accident a family combination automobile policy was in effect, issued by The Harleysville Mutual *220Insurance Company to Edward J. Wilbert, husband of Judith. Mr. and Mrs. Wilbert filed a claim under the uninsured motorist coverage clause of the policy, individually and on behalf of their three children. Harleysville…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Bankes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EalySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Daley-Sand v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Metro Transportation Co. v. North Star Reinsurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Brader v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, in 90-1534 v. Earl D. Hampton, Jr., Earl D. Hampton, Sr. And Barbara Hampton, in 90-1523Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API